Connect with us

News

Trump’s Next Term Could See America’s First True Oligarchs, Warns Democracy Activist Garry Kasparov

Published

on

Elon Musk’s DOGE plan could mix public and private interests in a way previously not seen in American politics, the former world chess champion said.
Elon Musk, rocket and electric car company chief, sometime Internet troll and more recently Donald Trump’s point man for cutting alleged waste from the federal government, may be on the cusp of becoming something else: the country’s first real oligarch.

That’s according to democracy activist and former world chess champion Garry Kasparov, chairman of the New York-based Renew Democracy Initiative.

Kasparov should know. As a celebrity chess prodigy in the 1980s, he tried to use his fame to buck the Communist system in Russia. Kasparov became a dissident after the Soviet Union fell, when Russian president Vladimir Putin began turning back the clock on the country’s nascent democracy.

“There’s certain lessons that I think we can learn from Russia in the ’90s. The blurring of the lines between business and politics, which is called oligarchy by classical political philosophy ― it’s extremely dangerous,” Kasparov told HuffPost in a recent interview.

Russia and some other post-Soviet countries, like Belarus or Kazahkstan, have struggled with democratic reforms and are run by strongmen able to subvert the law to reward their supporters and punish their opponents.
And Musk ― as both a major government contractor (by way of his companies) and now, potentially, as a Trump official with either formal or informal authority over how the government is reorganized ― could go beyond merely being wealthy and influential, Kasparov said.

“Musk could be the first oligarch,” he said. “Having the largest private contractor of the U.S. government potentially being in the position of supervising the entire U.S. budget? I mean, just think about it. If this is not classical oligarchy, what is it?”

“Oligarchy is not about the amount of money,” Kasparov went on. “Oligarchy is about blurring the line, erasing the line, between business and government.”

Ultimately, he said the question will hinge on whether Musk and the still nebulous Department of Government Efficiency — currently not an official agency — will operate within or outside of usual federal government ethics safeguards, and whether Musk will have to step aside from his CEO roles to run DOGE to avoid conflicts of interest.

That’s because the concept of “conflicts of interest” doesn’t exist under oligarchy, he said.

Official government departments can only be created by Congress, and Trump’s announcement of DOGE made it sound as if the new “department” will be only advisory in nature, at least on paper.

Regardless, Musk has posted often on social media in ways suggesting it will have real power. He criticized the expensive F-35 fighter jet program, drawing the ire of many defense analysts. And he posted that the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, meant to crack down on fraud in consumer lending, should be eliminated.

Things may be clearer after Musk meets with congressional Republicans Dec. 5 on Capitol Hill.

Trump has attacked democracy by collapsing the boundaries of what’s seen as normal, Kasparov said. Trump is already the first convicted felon to win the office and the first president to ever be impeached twice. But Kasparov said the thing to watch is not what laws Trump breaks this time but what norms he violates, and what he does simply by using the power of his office.

He pointed to the fate of the Jan. 6, 2021, insurrectionists as one possible example, saying he wouldn’t be surprised if some were pardoned and they were welcomed into the Oval Office with pomp and circumstance.

“Presidential power will allow him to pardon these people, which will send a message to his supporters across the country: They will always be immune if they act on behalf of Donald Trump,” he said.

Similarly, he said Trump’s slate of right-wing Cabinet nominees, including Fox News host Pete Hegseth for defense secretary and former Rep. Tulsi Gabbard for director of national intelligence, represented another effort to break norms.

As “something that was abnormal becomes normal, he moves further,” Kasparov said.

As for solutions, he said Democrats need to examine the reasons they lost and learn from them. In a recent Wall Street Journal op-ed, Kasparov laid the blame at the feet of Kamala Harris and her failure to “separate herself from Democrats’ bankrupt and alienating status quo.”

“I think she was a bad candidate, and it was a very poor campaign,” he told HuffPost.

Strongmen depend on their opponents getting weary and turning inward and away from politics, a luxury Kasparov said Trump critics can’t afford now.

“They want us to be passive. And yes, they voted and they lost,” he said of Harris supporters. “But what I learned from the game of chess, and I’ve been saying it at every lecture I did about strategy, [is] you have to understand why you lost.”

Kasparov came to prominence in the mid-1980s as a young chess upstart, representing a break from the stodgy apparatchiks favored by Soviet officials as champions. At 22, he was the youngest world chess champion ever. (The 40th anniversary of the famous 48-game, five-month-long match with Anatoly Karpov, considered chess’ version of the famous Muhammad Ali-Joe Frazier “Thrilla in Manila” boxing match, is only a few months away.)

In 2013, Kasparov fled Russia for the U.S. Now, with professional chess behind him and as the father of children who are U.S. citizens, he said he’s found a second calling in fighting autocracy globally.

“It’s somehow in great demand in America,” he said, of his experience living in the Soviet Union and in Putin’s Russia. “I didn’t expect it, but I’m more than happy to share my experience, because I can speak from the position of authority.”

And he urged people who, like him, are anxious about democracy not to give up — and not just for the sake of the U.S.

“The game is not over. America is still a free country,” he said, calling it “a bigger hope” to billions of people globally.”

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Trump Nominates Conservative Lawyer Harmeet Dhillon To Lead DOJ Civil Rights Division

Published

on

By

Harmeet Dhillon was chosen by the president-elect to replace Kristen Clarke on the Justice Department’s civil rights efforts.

President-elect Donald Trump announced on Monday that he plans to nominate a conservative California attorney to lead a critical division of the Department of Justice.

Harmeet Dhillon, a former vice chairwoman of the California GOP and a national committeewoman for the Republican National Committee, was selected by Trump to serve as assistant attorney general for civil rights at the Justice Department. She would replace Kristen Clarke, who became the first woman and first Black woman to run the division in 2021.

Trump, who described Dhillon as one of the “top Election lawyers” in the country in his Truth Social announcement, said that she would have a large role in voting rights enforcement.

“Throughout her career, Harmeet has stood up consistently to protect our cherished Civil Liberties, including taking on Big Tech for censoring our Free Speech, representing Christians who were prevented from praying together during COVID, and suing corporations who use woke policies to discriminate against their workers,” he wrote.

Dhillon combated stay-at-home orders during the COVID-19 pandemic. She filed several lawsuits against government-level regulations, arguing there was overreach. The lawsuits Dhillon filed came after Democratic California Gov. Gavin Newsom became the first governor to issue statewide stay-at-home orders to shut down nonessential activities and interests to combat the spread of the coronavirus.

In 2018, Dhillon founded the conservative nonprofit The Center for American Liberty, which has filed lawsuits challenging vaccine requirements and trans-inclusive school policies. Most notably, Dhillon currently represents Chloe Cole, a young activist who sued Kaiser Permanente in California after she detransitioned from male to female. Cole has rallied alongside Republican politicians and conservative media figures, and has testified in support of dozens of state laws restricting access to gender-affirming care for trans youth.

Dhillon is highly critical of blue states that aim to uphold and protect rights for transgender people in light of ongoing legislative attacks. She said Maine’s “shield” law, which protects reproductive health care providers and trans people, is “unconstitutional” and expressed concerns about future protections in California.

A staunch opponent of abortion herself, the attorney also unsuccessfully represented anti-abortion activist David Daleiden, who in 2016 used a fake driver’s license to pose as a biomedical company executive and tried to buy fetal tissue from Planned Parenthood, in an effort to accuse the health care provider of selling tissue for profit.

Dhillon, who was born in India and is a practicing Sikh, has faced pushback from fellow Republicans due to questions of her faith. After she announced in 2022 that she would challenge RNC Chair Ronna McDaniel for her position, several members of the RNC circulated a video of Dhillon opening a 2016 Republican National Convention with a Sikh prayer. In a letter to Alabama Republicans in 2023 responding to the incident, Dhillon addressed concerns about her faith and slammed McDaniel’s leadership. Alabama Republican Chris Horn questioned how Dhillon’s religion would impact policy to NBC. McDaniel condemned attacks on religion but told Politico her allies questioned how Dhillon’s faith would impact the party.

Last year, former Fox News host and conservative political commentator Tucker Carlson hired Dhillon to represent him in a gender discrimination lawsuit by his former producer, Abby Grossberg. The ensuing settlement resulted in Fox paying Grossberg $12 million.

“I’m extremely honored by President Trump’s nomination to assist with our nation’s civil rights agenda,” Dhillon said in a post on X (formerly known as Twitter). “It has been my dream to be able to serve our great country, and I am so excited to be part of an incredible team of lawyers led by @PamBondi. I cannot wait to get to work!”

Continue Reading

News

Trump’s Utterly Absurd Take On Birthright Citizenship Involves Walking Infants

Published

on

By

The president-elect appeared very confused about how American citizenship is conferred.

In a freewheeling interview with NBC News Sunday, President-elect Donald Trump offered a head-scratching explanation for his plan to wage an attack on birthright citizenship.

“Did you know, if somebody sets a foot — just a foot, one foot, you don’t need two — on our land, congratulations, you are now a citizen of the United States of America,” Trump said, when discussing birthright citizenship.

“Yes, we’re going to end that, because it’s ridiculous,” he added.

Trump appeared to describe a hypothetical scenario in which a woman would give birth to an infant who — either capable of walking at birth or helped along by someone eager to win a bet — would set one foot on American soil and the other in either Mexico or Canada.

It is also possible Trump was imagining an infant hopping or standing on one leg. Neither scenario is plausible.

Trump also repeatedly asked whether the interviewer, Kristen Welker of “Meet the Press,” knew that the United States was the only country that conferred citizenship by birthright.

“We’re the only country that has it, you know,” Trump said. “You know we’re the only country that has it.”

Birthright citizenship is commonly recognized in the Americas, including in Canada and Mexico. Also known by its Latin legal term as “jus soli,” it is the concept of conferring citizenship by birth in a given country. Most countries instead recognize “jus sanguinis,” which instead confers citizenship based on the nationality of a person’s parents.

Welker did not challenge Trump’s utterly wrong description of how birthright citizenship works or that the United States is not alone in recognizing it. But she asked whether Trump intended to enact his proposed change through executive action.

“Well, if we can, through executive action,” Trump said. “I was going to do it through executive action, but then we had to fix COVID first, to be honest with you.”

Birthright citizenship is protected by the 14th Amendment to the Constitution. The president cannot use executive action to overturn a constitutional amendment, though legal experts expect the Trump administration to challenge the long-settled legal interpretation through the courts.

Trump has spent significant time in southern Florida, which is home to a large Cuban-American community.

He likely came up with this weird description of birthright citizenship by free-associating the issue with the now-defunct policy of allowing Cuban migrants to stay within the United States and pursue citizenship upon touching American soil. The policy was known as “wet-foot, dry-foot.”

During this year’s presidential campaign, Trump repeatedly described immigrants as coming from jails and mental institutions. He was likely resurrecting assertions he heard during the era of the Mariel boatlift four decades ago.

Continue Reading

News

Trump Trolls Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, Stirs Controversy

Published

on

By

Trump mocks the United States’ northern ally
In a post just after midnight on Truth Social, Trump took aim at Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau with a mocking reference, calling him “Governor Justin Trudeau of the Great State of Canada.”

The comment, a throwback to Trump’s past suggestion that Canada might become the 51st U.S. state if they can’t handle his tariffs, is an insult to both Trudeau and Canada.

Trump recently posted an AI image of himself looking into Canada as if to annex it. Trump’s midnight post, claiming to look forward to future discussions on tariffs and trade with “Governor Trudeau,” further stoked tensions with a key ally and makes one question his diplomatic judgment.

Trump’s post undermines the United States’ relationship with Canada. Calling the Canadian leader a “Governor” belittles the sovereignty of a close neighbor and trading partner, and further feeds into the narrative of disrespect that Trump has often displayed toward foreign leaders. 

The United States and Canada share deep economic, cultural, and geopolitical ties, and statements like this can jeopardize decades of cooperation. Trump is proving once again he will be an embarrassment to the United States.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2017 Zox News Theme. Theme by MVP Themes, powered by WordPress.